On one side of the room, we've got Sarah Clark's two posts on the "dark side" of Library 2.0:

The Dark Side of Library 2.0, Part 1: "It's the Patron, Stupid!"

The Dark Side of Library 2.0, Part 2: new bridges...new divides?

On the other side of the room, we've got Laura Cohen's rebuttal to Sarah's posts:

Is There a "Dark Side" to Library 2.0?

Laura's overall argument is that while Sarah raises some good points, her concerns really have nothing to do with Library 2.0.

Not to sound wishy-washy, but I think both of them make important points. In the end, I'm inclined to agree with Laura that the "dark side" Sarah's worried about isn't really a dark side to Library 2.0. But I'm eager to hear what other people think about this. Is there a "dark side" to L2.0? If there is, is it what Sarah's writing about?

The government is at it again, with Senator Ted "Tubes" Stevens introducing a bill that is pretty much DOPA redux, with some extra porn-hatin' written into it.

Personally, I don't think it will pass. But then, I've overestimated congress before...

Hello,

Is anyone using Drupal for either a blog or website?
Are you loving it? Learning curve?
I'm doing some freelance work, and I have a feeling that I will eventually be taking over the website responsibilities at my job (if I survive here that long), and I am interested in Drupal. Was just wondering what other librarian types thought.

Jessica

Looks like the Maplewood library won't be closing its doors after all. At least until the regular closing time. And the community is stepping up to help out, which is a good thing.

1. Look at these three posts in which librarian bloggers confess that they avoid their local public libraries because the library is an unfriendly, difficult to use place.

2. Read this article about how the Maplewood Memorial Library in Maplewood, NJ, will be closing its doors from 2:45-5 on weekdays because they feel a certain group of users (in this case, teens) are uncontrollable, making the library a place that is unfriendly and difficult to use. Also read these posts (and comments) on Jessamyn's and our own Jessica's blogs. (Edit: Also read this Library Crunch post on Maplewood and the problem of unruly teens.)

3. Discuss.

Jessica had some obvious problems switching this blog from the old Blogger to the new Blogger Beta. She's not the only one who has blogged about Blogger Beta problems.

Now, I'm a big fan of the concept of "beta is forever," which has become one of the defining principles of Library 2.0. But releasing a product or service in beta that causes more frustrations, and more frustrated public blog posts, doesn't do anyone much good. I'm not saying everything has to work perfectly, but there should be more positives than negatives. When Firefox 2 came out, there were some problems (heck, my own upgrade on our family computer went much less than smoothly, making me a very cranky and unhappy camper), but in general, the responses I saw to it (and my own overall feelings about it) were positive.

I've really tried to apply "beta is forever" and good beta practices a part of my regular work at my library. When we're planning new programs and services and hammering out all of the details, I think it's important to keep in mind, and the remind everyone else, that what we present to the public doesn't have to be perfect, the final product. But it does have to be good, and we shouldn't put something out that's half-assed and a dollar short.

What does everyone else think about "beta is forever"? In what ways have you (or could you) apply it to your regular work? In what way can it be practically applied to librarianship in general? And in what ways is it a bad idea?

EDIT: In trying to set up "labels" for this post, I got a bunch of error messages that basically tell me the new Blogger doesn't handle tagging all that well.

Just in case there is any confusion:

Anyone can post a new topic to this blog once they have signed up for a Blogger account using their GOOGLE login information. Once that step is complete, just send me an email with/from your PREFERRED email address. YOU DO NOT HAVE TO SEND ME YOUR GOOGLE OR BLOGGER INFO! All I need is the email address where you would like to receive your invatation to join the blog. Once you get your invitation, follow the instructions to ACCEPT the invitation. You will then be added to the Library Talk blog as a poster.

Right now I seem to be all set with moderators - thanks for all the interest!

ANYONE can comment and participate in the discussions - you do not need to be a Library Talk poster, or even have a Blogger account.

Library Talk (as well as my other blogs) has moved over to the BETA version of Blogger.
Since this is a new blog created using an unmodified template, I don't anticipate any big problems. On the plus side, posters will now be able to (and are encouraged to!) tag their posts; I will add a "tags" section to the sidebar prontito. Just FYI: Blogger calls tags "labels," and "labels" can be added in the lower-right corner of the post screen.

If you encounter any problems with the BETA version, please let me know.